Joe
Biden, Difference of Opinion?
For my blog this week I decided to
take a look at the television media difference in the story coverage of Joe
Biden’s decision to not run for the presidential nomination. In order to view
this story from different political sources I decided to look at videos
covering this story from a liberal news channel and a conservative news
station. After doing some research I found that according to journalism.org CNN
is know as a liberal new source while Fox news was considered a conservative
news site (http://www.journalism.org/2014/10/21/section-1-media-sources-distinct-favorites-emerge-on-the-left-and-right/).
After watching the same story about Joe Biden covered by each source I compared
the two sources to see if there were any difference on how Biden was portrayed.
I noticed a few differences when
viewing the two sources covering Joe Biden’s withdrawal from the democratic
race. CNN displayed the decision of Joe Biden to not run with grace and lifted
him up as being a crucial member of the party and as having accomplished much.
This is not however the big difference between the two news sources as Fox News
also talked about Biden in a positive light. The big difference was how these
two sources interpreted one crucial line Joe Biden delivered in his speech
addressing withdrawing from the race. Joe said, “I do not believe like some do
that it is naïve to talk to republicans. I do not think we should look at
republicans as our enemies”. This line was interpreted very differently by each
of the news sources and was a largely interpreted by each news source based on
their political affiliation.
CNN took the approach that this line
was not an attack on Hilary Clinton, who was the main beneficiary of Biden
dropping out the race, but rather a call for the need for the parties to work
together to advance the country. CNN said, “ It turns out he was not firing a
warning shot this week at Hilary Clinton over her suggestion that republicans
are the enemy… He was offering an optimistic lesson to fix a broken
Washington.” They then used another
quote after the context. He said, “I believe we have to end the divisive
partisan politics that are ripping the country apart. (http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/21/politics/2016-election-joe-biden-impact/)
Fox news took this same quote and
put a different spin on it. Their side of this quote went as follows. “It’s
telling Biden is not offering an endorsement of Clinton”. They then cut to the
same quote, “I do not believe like some do that it is naïve to talk to
republicans. I do not think we should look at republicans as our enemies”. Fox
News then goes on to report about how Biden attacked Clinton’s word choice in
the debate and reported that Biden could step in if Clinton’s FBI case goes
south. (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/10/21/biden-to-speak-in-rose-garden/)
If a person were to only see one of
these news sources they would be inclined to think that either Biden supports
or does not support Clinton. These characteristics exemplify polarization in
our society and especially in our political system. These news sources took a
quote and injected their own opinion on Joe Biden’s words and how they related
to Hilary Clinton. While this divided issue is a result of Hilary Clinton
campaign and not necessarily about Joe Biden, they certainly use his words to
support their respective sides.
Those are really good examples of media outlets that you used. Do you think the Media has an overall negative affect on Biden's image?
ReplyDeleteIneresting examples! How do you think these articles stating opposite opinions effect the politics of Joe Biden?
ReplyDeleteWell said. Do you think its ethical for media outlets to spin things in way of their opinions?
ReplyDelete